For this week’s reading we get to look at a doctor’s biased history of the progress of pregnancy in the past 500 years or so. Alongside that article we also have a critique from a non medical perspective. I think both articles have valuable points on different aspects of childbirth but reading these two articles more than anything just made me unsure about childbirth.
Gawande’s article made a number of points which I thought were interesting and worthy for any family expecting a baby. He narrates a story of the Rourke family’s pregnancy while giving us a long detailed history of how far childbirth has come. His ongoing narrative of Rourke and everything she had to go through was really a strong point in the article. We weren’t forced to read a long article about scientific childbirth jargon but had a remarkable and I’m assuming true story for relief. Gawande gives us fact after fact about childbirth and it all seems valid yet overwhelming. His main point of the article is how childbirth has become a meticulous form of art through all the new advancements in technology. A woman has so many more choices now of how to have her baby and according to Gawande they are for the better. He specifically claims that “almost nothing else in medicine has saved lives on the scale that obstetrics has”. Gawande’s point really hits home when Rourke, who all along wanted an au natural childbirth, was saved after 40 hours of labor through the new technologies of today.
Goer on the other hand seems to believe that the old way of doing things is the best. After reading all the facts about the new industrial childbirths of today, Goer gives us a counter argument for all of it. While it is called a “deconstruction” and Goer certainly does have somewhat of an angry undertone, she gives us numerous facts and numbers that work against Gawande’s argument. She definitely did her homework with close to half of the entire article being statistics on childbirth.
After reading both of these articles I really didn’t know what to think. I want to trust the doctor who should know what he is talking about. But Goer does such a good job contradicting Gawande I was left without closure. Technology is without a doubt something good and many of us might not be here today if not for all the medical advancements in the past century. I also believe that doulas and other methods Goer talks about can be very useful in childbirth. Much like the abortion topic we discusses on Tuesday, I think that every woman is different and the choice is ultimately hers. Bodies react differently and different doctors might have different styles. The best a woman can do is research and learn as much as possible and hope for the best.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with a lot of what Trey is saying concerning the Gawande and Goer articles, both of which left me very conflicted. I think that there are so many aspects and factors that go into the type of childbirth a woman chooses or is forced into and that they can't be reduced to a "this is better" situation. I think that is why I related more to the Gawande article, because at least he--though in favor of the technological advances that have been made--also wasn't completely discounting natural birth. Goer was not so tact. She made her points in an attacking manner, which turned me off her points. Plus, as Trey points out, we are taught to believe the authority of doctors. I don't think that every birth is going to be as changing and complicated as Rourke's, but I also don't think that childbirth is as simple an issue as, "This is the better method, don't do that one." There are always risks. It’s up to the mother to decide what her comfort level with each method is and choose accordingly.
ReplyDeleteTrey and Brittani,
ReplyDeleteYou both bring up really good points: we ARE taught to trust doctors, and both Gawande and Goer's articles (ineffective as Goer's writing may be) make us question this blind trust. As Trey points out, education and awareness is a solution. However, how accessible is this education, and to whom? How is privilege involved in childbirth decisions and procedures?
I agree with brittani and trey in that the articles were both very convincing. After reading the Gawande article i was much in favor of technological advancements in childbirth and how those have had a positive impact on saving child birth and saving lives and more variety on the comfort of the woman giving birth. however Goer brought up some very convincing and forceful arguments on more natural births. ultimately once i took both article into account and thought of them for myself i found the Gawande article to reflect womens decisions and choice because he leaves all options open--more than Goer atleast and therefore puts trust in doctors and the many advancements in technology that we have put so much time and money into implementing.
ReplyDeleteI agree with all three of my blogers in that the articles were convincing. Technology is good for having babies because at best the woman can delivery her baby. I believe that since babies are premature, delivering at a hospital could be help to know if they baby is correctly functioning. I also agree with the domestic childbirth because baby do have a greater chance of surviving due to the lack of control over technology. I agree that women should have a choice. If they want to use technology, they should be able to use it. I think that there should be less pressure to towards women so that they could be more comfortable if they would like a natural childbirth. These are great responsibilities for women and ultimately they should have the choice with the most valid education so that the baby and mother can be happy after it is over.
ReplyDeleteIf you're looking for an excellent contextual advertising network, I recommend that you check out PropellerAds.
ReplyDelete